home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TIME: Almanac 1995
/
TIME Almanac 1995.iso
/
time
/
092892
/
09289912.000
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1994-03-25
|
2KB
|
58 lines
<text id=92TT2138>
<title>
Sep. 28, 1992: Doctors' Cure
</title>
<history>
TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1992
Sep. 28, 1992 The Economy
</history>
<article>
<source>Time Magazine</source>
<hdr>
THE WEEK, Page 22
SOCIETY
Doctors' Cure
</hdr><body>
<p>A new health-care proposal from an influential physicians' group
</p>
<p> Few people dispute that a way must be found to provide
medical coverage for the more than 35 million Americans who have
no insurance, and fewer still that the U.S. desperately needs at
the same time to control the runaway growth of health-care
costs (1991 total: $700 billion). The American College of
Physicians has waded into this widening crisis with a dramatic
plan for accomplishing those inherently contradictory goals. The
society of 78,000 doctors has concluded that the only way to fix
the U.S. health-care system is to set a budget and stick to it.
Most surprising, the organization concedes that doctors' fees
should be regulated. Says Dr. John Ball, executive vice
president of the group: "We doctors are willing to make the
first move."
</p>
<p> The plan is a "pay or play" system that would replace
Medicare and Medicaid while ensuring universal coverage as well.
Employers would either cover their workers or pay a fee to a
taxpayer-supported government system. This government plan would
also cover the unemployed, people older than 60 and Americans
with high-cost illnesses, under a so-called global budget, with
total annual spending to be set by Congress. While the proposed
system resembles the Canadian plan, it would not prevent people
from choosing their own doctors.
</p>
<p> The plan stirred immediate debate. The Clinton campaign,
which has offered its own pay-or-play system, applauded the
proposal. The Bush Administration, which opposes fee regulation,
attacked it. By far the sharpest criticism, though, came from
the 271,000-member American Medical Association, which says the
program would inevitably lead to medical rationing. Said Dr.
James Todd, executive vice president of the A.M.A.: "Pay-or-play
and global budgets are contrary to the American way." Perhaps,
but then, so is a system that currently forces millions of
American workers and their children to go without medical
coverage--a form of rationing in itself.
</p>
</body></article>
</text>